|
Helmut_Lammer's Rebuttal to Victoria Alexander's "What Would Freud Say?" By Helmut_Lammer, Ph.D.
|
|
I feel "honored" to have received a reply from Victoria Alexander after the insignificant period of two years. Given the length of her article and the substantial number of quotes, I can understand what took her so long. It's just unfortunate that in all these two years she could not spare the time to carefully read my article "Preliminary Findings of Project MILAB." It is obvious that Mrs. Alexander wrote her recent response under the false impression that I try to explain ALL alleged alien abduction cases as kidnappings by covert military personnel when she stated that I said there are "hundreds...[even thousands] of women who are victims of unwanted military surveillance." [1] Nowhere in my article did I state such numbers. To the contrary, I stated that only "some" abductees report such events. Furthermore, if Mrs. Alexander believes that in a budget as huge as SDI [strategic defense initiative] which is several tens of billions of U.S. dollars - there is no chance to transfer funds to black projects - then I urge her to study the literature about the funding of the Manhattan-Project, or perhaps she should read Tim Wiener's book Blank Check - The Pentagon's Black Budget. [2] For quite some time, all of these projects existed within the U.S. Government's budgetary structure, and no one else seemed to know about them. That the U.S. Government's budget structure can be secretly manipulated has been visibly proven by the Iran Contra affair. Contrary to Victoria's belief, the core of my investigated MILAB cases had first been reviewed by professional medical therapists before they were included in my work. Many of the normal psychological problems Mrs. Alexander has quoted - in no less than four long pages - have already been considered by several professional therapists. Although such psychological conditions can and do happen, they in no way can be used to explain all MILAB or alien abduction cases, as shown in our forthcoming book MILABS! [3] It is also interesting that most MILAB skeptics have military-intelligence backgrounds and believe it is impossible for covert military agencies to kidnap, examine and interrogate innocent people in democratic countries like the United States or Canada. These are citizens they have sworn to defend. Recently, declassified top secret cold war radiation experiments, covert bio-warfare experiments, illegal drug tests on unwitting people, and former mind-control projects like BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA, and MKSEARCH show that some individuals high up in the chain of command may have other ideas of how to defend their citizens. They may not be democratic, but they certainly exist. When I write about the military, then I am not implying the whole U.S. military community is involved. This group of citizens consist of people who fight for freedom all over the World. I am referring to only a small covert task force which has the "need to know" and operates in an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP), financed by way of the United States' infamous "black budget." I am not against the whole U.S. military and related agencies. However, I do believe the public has the right to know what's going on in USAPs where the enemy is not a hostile dictator or regime, but rather, people who are caught up in circumstances beyond their control: MILAB abductees and alleged alien abductees. Mrs. Alexander reads many things into my article which simply are not there: When I mentioned "triangulation of radio devices" by "three satellites or specially equipped helicopters," I in no way mentioned GPS! [Global Positioning Satellites] Triangulation techniques exist as long as radio waves are being emitted. This technology has been around for almost a century for ground based devices, and for several decades for satellite systems. Satellite triangulation is not necessarily confined to the GPS era. YES, Dr. Lammer believes covert military operations can track and tag abductees without a hitch - If they carry implanted bio-chips or electrodes. This technology has existed for decades and can be documented by researching the public literature. One of several examples I can provide involves the German Government. This government developed a brain implant for remote monitoring of physiological parameters in people for heart attack prevention or other medical purposes. This bio-telemetric brain implant is the size of a grain of rice (0.8 x 2 mm).[4] Of course, for monitoring alleged alien abductees (e.g. location via triangulation) one would not have to use satellites - three automobiles or fixed installations such as Handy-phone antenna masts (cellular phone antennas) would be perfectly adequate. Such systems are already operational for keeping track of criminals on probation. I recommend Mrs. Alexander ask her husband John B. Alexander about the research of Mrs. Debra Spencer who should be familiar to him from the SPIE conference in 1996, where he attended as a chairperson.[5] While we are writing about "Offender Monitoring," I'm sure that Mrs. Alexander and people who take her position often wish people like colonel Khaddafi, General Noriega and Saddam Hussein carried implanted devices. What other reason does she have to compare them with alleged alien abductees? I'd also like to make a note on her comment about the lack of continuous overhead reconnaissance from space platforms during Operation Desert Storm. This has to do with the laws of orbital mechanics and not with other possible applications for such satellites. Apparently Mrs. Alexander has applied her version of "basic logic" to my article and has concluded that my theories are "flawed at the most fundamental level." Victoria must be using "FUZZY" logic! Mrs. Alexander shows a sad lack of knowledge of state-of-the-art technologies if she considers triangulation by satellites impossible prior to 1989. Despite her shortcomings in the field of physics and aerospace science, it is "amazing" that she can combine such diverse talents as "expert" psychological knowledge, equivalent to the level of professional medical doctors with decades of experience, as well as detailed insight into the science of tracking transmitter devices. Concerning the title of Mrs. Alexander's reply, What Would Freud say? - Dr. Freud was an innovative man ready and willing to navigate and explore uncharted waters against strong opposition. I think Freud would say: "I don't know, but let's find out!" [1] Victoria Alexander, "What Would Freud Say?" March 1999. The version we received was electronically distributed throughout the Internet by Peter Gersten. [2] Tim Wiener, Blank Check - The Pentagon's Black Budget (Warner Books, New York, 1991). [3] Marion and Helmut_Lammer, Ph.D., MILABS: Military Mind Control and Alien Abduction, Illuminetpress, [Spring Release] 1999. For more information: see Illuminetpress.com [4] Bochdansky, Alexander: Ein Chip im Kopf schlaegt Alarm, Modern Times, Austrian TV2, January 9, 1998. [5] Debra Spencer, "Wide Area Continuous Offender Monitoring," SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2938, 1996, 166 - 177. |
