|
Everybody who is following the continuing debate about my
research into alleged military involvement in the alien
abduction phenomenon - so called MILAB cases, know which
people are trying to ridicule this research and our book
MILABS! which is now available in the United States,
[1] and of course me.[2,3,4] I will not respond to all
articles in the future which attack my research or my
reputation since I believe it is more important for me to
use my time for things which are more meaningful and
important.
I find it interesting that the skeptics are now claiming
that their responses address only my MILAB cases.
This is important to know, since I do not "own" MILAB
abductees and some of these people have also been
investigated by other researchers like Budd Hopkins, or
researchers related to the MUFON Abduction Transcription
Project, etc. It is not my problem if the well known
abduction researchers have ignored such cases in their
research articles and books. Second, there are more MILAB
abductees which have been investigated by professional
therapists and psychiatrists than the few which are known
via the Internet. Therefore, the skeptic's statement is
complete nonsense.
Another interesting aspect of their criticism is that
they are attempting to convince their readers that my
research concentrates only on tracking devices and implants,
and that I claim that all MILAB abductees are implanted with
tracking devices. This is certainly not the case. It is
correct that there are "some" MILAB cases where evidence
indicates that the abductees were implanted with a
terrestrial device. It is well known in research areas such
as zoology and medicine, that such devices have been in use
for a long time.[5]
Mossad's Implant Technology
Recently, there have been many newspaper articles in
Europe about an implant with satellite tracking applications
which was developed by the Israeli intelligence agency
Mossad. This implant is now available from a private firm in
Italy. Since the skeptics read the MUFON UFO Journal,
they should know about this since there was a short article
regarding this implant technology in the November 1998
issue. It is also common knowledge that this "commercially"
available implant does not contain the latest state of the
art "military" or "black project" technology.
I agree with the skeptics that older implants would be
easy to detect on x-rays and MRIs because they are
relatively large. I am aware of cases where the subjects
have x-rays, MRIs and medical statements from independent
doctors, where everybody can see that they were implanted
with such devices. Interestingly however, nobody will remove
their implants![6,7]
Very interesting is the claim by the skeptics that the
proposed MILAB projects fail a simple test in common sense,
since there is just no reason to conduct such experiments
and the alleged victims are not extremely intelligent, for
example, no Noble laureate is involved.[4]
It is known from declassified CIA-MKULTRA subproject No.
94 documents, that the CIA experimented with miniaturized
electrode implants 30 years ago! The purpose of subproject
No. 94 was:[8]
"1. The purpose of this subproject is to
provide a continuation of activities in selected species of
animals. Miniaturized stimulating electrode implants in
specific brain center areas will be utilized.
2. Initial biological work on techniques and brain
locations essential to providing conditioning and control of
activities in several species of animals has been
demonstrated...The ultimate objective of this research is to
provide an understanding of the mechanisms involved in the
directional control of animals and to provide practical
systems suitable for (censored) application."
There has been a long standing interest in implant
research for mind and behavior control purposes. Since there
is also evidence in the form of a declassified research
proposal of MKULTRA subproject No. 94 [9] that selected
elements of the techniques developed under this project were
applicable to humans, one can speculate that some of the
before mentioned cases may have been used in such
experiments. If one reviews the known MKULTRA subprojects
from documents which have been released via the FOIA, one
will find many projects where outsiders claim there is no
reason for doing this. However, some people decided there
were good reasons.[10]
Tuskegee Experiments
The skeptics claim that a reason for the former unwise
government experiments like the cold war radiation
experiments, MKULTRA, Tuskegee, etc. could be made (of
course not for MILABS
), although Alexander writes that he
does not make excuses or apologies for these experiments.
"In Tuskegee, doctors wanted to determine how Syphilis would
progress if left untreated."[4] I will not comment on such
statements about the former illegal unethical cold war
experiments, because I believe they speak for themselves.
In the so-called Tuskegee experiments, hundreds of
African-Americans were subjected to sexually transmitted
diseases while the experimenters withheld appropriate
medication that could have cured their disease. The
medication was not administered in order to continue to
collect information on the disease's degenerative effects.
Beginning in 1932, the "Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis
in the Negro Male" subjected 412 African-American
sharecroppers who had contracted syphilis to 40 years of
monitoring aimed at documenting the effects of the disease.
All of the victims were permitted to pass through the
various chronic stages of illness, suffering from long-term
disabilities such as blindness, paralysis, dementia and
eventually premature death, even well after penicillin was
found to be a highly effective treatment.[11]
I would be very interested to know what the Tuskegee
survivors would have to say today knowing that scientists
from a secret agency conducted a risk-benefit analysis and
chose to proceed in this experiment.
No "Nobel Laureates" Experimented On
Interestingly, only black Americans were used in this
experiment. There were no "Nobel laureates" or persons of
publicly acclaimed accomplishments used in this
nazi-style-project. The reason for this is they used people
who were social and political outsiders of the time.
Tuskegee is a very good example where one can see why it is
better to use the average "nobody," minorities and poor
people for covert or secret unethical experiments, as
opposed to lawyers, academics and Nobel laureate's, etc.
I agree that some of the people who claim that
they hear voices and are used in secret experiments or are
abducted by aliens, are paranoid or are experiencing
delusions or may be mentally ill. However, I also believe
there are some people who are not! Therefore, I believe it
would be logical to use natural phenomena, strange
psychological phenomena, unexplained and generally ridiculed
phenomena as a cover for top secret experiments.
Alien Abductions as a "Cover"
How easy such a cover would work is evident from the
present discussion and statements by the skeptics. They
claim that these people are crazy and are experiencing
hallucinations or what have you. If this is really going on
then the skeptics are right: "That is human, not alien
intervention."[4] An alien cover would be excellent. If
alleged victims were to go to the police as the skeptics
suggest and tell them that people in military uniforms
experimented on them and the police officer learns that the
person has also claimed alien abduction experiences, the
victim would be immediately ridiculed.
On the other hand, there are also MILAB cases which point
in a different direction. These are cases where it seems to
me that the military is involved, or their officers believe
that "some alien abductions" may be a true, unexplained
phenomena. These are cases where it does not seem they would
use the abduction phenomenon as a cover for secret
experiments, but rather, would like to know what is really
going on in alien abduction cases. Another possibility is it
could be that these military units are involved in
pseudo-alien abductions in order to propagate an alien
threat. Of course, this is speculation and more data is
needed.
Double Standard for Reporting Unusual Phenomena
The MILAB skeptics claim that one can see from my
research that I lack an understanding of technical
knowledge; the ability to completely analyze information,
political science, military science, budget and finance,
organizational sociology and psychology and psychiatry. I
can only say that I trust NASA's cameras and my scientific
knowledge more than the stories of the former military
remote viewers who are good friends and former colleagues of
the skeptics; and who have also claimed during public
meetings and in magazine articles that they remote viewed
Martians, artificial structures on the Martian surface,
machines under the surface of Mars, the disappearance of the
Russian Phobos 2 probe and other nonsense.[12]
I exposed some of this nonsense in the peer reviewed
border science Journal, "Journal of Scientific
Exploration."[13] Why were the MILAB skeptics quiet as their
friends, former colleagues, etc. delivered mental food for
their estimated 10 million people who suffer from paranoid
delusions, unreal entities, voices, bedroom-related visions
and hypnagogic experiences?
For the fields of knowledge where I have no immediate
training myself e.g. psychiatry, military science, etc. I
make a habit out of consulting with experienced
professionals with many years of experience in these fields.
The opinions I present in my books and articles may have
more weight than these skeptics want to believe.
By Helmut_Lammer, Ph.D. Copyright 1999
References
[1] Lammer, Helmut, and Lammer, Marion: MILABS!:
Military Mind Control and Alien Abduction,
Illuminetpress, USA, 1999.
[2] Alexander, Victoria: "MILABS
" MUFON UFO
Journal, February 1997.
[3] Alexander, Victoria: What Would Freud Say",
CAUS, on-line newsletter, March 1999.
[4] Alexander, John: John Alexander on MILABS
,
http://www.konformist.com, April 1999.
[5] Savages, Science and citations of Brain-Computer
Technology: A compilation of 25 scientific papers
concerning research in brain-computer interface, and
bio-medical microelectronic implants, Gruppen P.O. Box 136,
114 79 Stockholm, Sweden.
[6] Naeslund, Robert: Branded by the Security
Police, Gruppen P.O. Box 136, 114 79 Stockholm, Sweden.
[7] Jones, Janine: Implant Victim Seeks Help, 1/66
Robinson Avenue, Holdens Bay, Rotorua, New Zealand.
[8] Memorandum for the record: Subject: Project MKULTRA,
Subproject No. 94, 22. November, 1961; declassified FOIA
released document concerning brain telemetry studies on
animals.
[9] Research Proposal for MKULTRA, Subproject No. 94,
declassified FOIA released document.
[10] Memorandum for the Director of Central Intelligence:
Subject: Report of Inspection of MKULTRA, 26. July, 1963;
declassified FOIA released documents.
[11] Sklar, Morton: Torture in the United States,
World Organization Against Torture USA, Suite 400,1015 18th
Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036, E-mail:
msklar@igc.apc.org, 1998.
[12] Stubblebine, Albert, N. III (Retired Major-General,
INSCOM): "Remote viewing and the psychic intelligence
agents," Talk at the International Symposium on UFO
Research, May, 1992; also in: Nexus magazine,
August-September, 1994. Major Ed Dames and other former
military remote viewer claimed at various books, conferences
etc. that they remote viewed Martians, artificial
structures, the disappearance of the Phobos 2 space craft
and other scientific nonsense.
[13] Lammer, Helmut: "Atmospheric mass loss on Mars and
the Consequences for the Cydonian Hypothesis and Martian
life forms," Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10:3,
1996.
|