earth-lt
GET-header-rt

The Geneticist known as
“DNA Deep Throat”

 

Is the human genome completely sequenced? Yes and No

“...within the limits of today’s technology, the human genome is as complete as it can be. Small gaps that are unrecoverable in any current sequencing method remain, amounting for about 1 percent of the gene-containing portion of the genome, or euchromatin. New technologies will have to be invented to obtain the sequence of these regions.” Source

 

By Lloyd Pye and the Lloyd Pye Team

DNA Deep Throat

My Intervention Theory Essentials eBook concludes with a letter I received from a mainstream geneticist known as DNA Deep throat. Many of you who have now read Intervention Theory Essentials have been astonished by that letter, as I assumed you would be, and now are asking to know more about that gentleman and the mainstream “secret” he was sharing with me.

Here is an excerpt from his letter to me:



Dear Mr. Pye:

I agree with your conclusions [that humans are genetically engineered] and will give you a few hints, if you wish [speaking] as a “DNA Deep Throat.” First, look up the huge discontinuities between humans and the various apes for: (1) Whole mitochondrial DNA; (2) genes for the Rh Factor; (3) and human Y chromosomes, among others.

Regarding #3, I refer you to K.D. Smith’s 1987 study titled “Repeated DNA sequences of the human Y chromosome.” It says “Most human Y chromosome sequences thus far examined do not have homologues [same relative position or structure] on the Y chromosomes of other primates.” Human female X chromosomes do look somewhat apelike, but not the male’s Y.

This means that if humans are a crossbred species, the cross had to be between a female ape-like creature [i.e, “creature of Earth”] and a male being from elsewhere.

-DNA DEEP THROAT

 


[“Deep Throat” was the euphemism used by Mark Felt to protect his identity as he revealed the Nixon administration’s involvement in the Watergate scandal to reporter Bob Woodward in 1972.]


There is more to the letter, but these three paragraphs will be the focus for this Byte. The last paragraph is dealt with extensively in the eBook, and has generated much comment among readers because of the story of Zana, an almas type hominoid that lived in a village in Russia for 40 years, and which crossbred with human men to produce several dominantly human offspring.


The sex-determining chromosomes are X and Y. If you obtain an X from one parent and an X from the other, you are a female. If you have an X from one and a Y from the other, you are a male. So the Y confers “maleness,” yet it is by far the smallest of the chromosomes delivered to any offspring.


In the 1987 study Deep Throat referenced in 1999, the term “most” was used when pointing out that human Y sequences do not match with the Y sequences of higher primates (chief of which are chimps, supposedly the closest genetic relative to humans). However, since then it has been well established that in all chromosome comparisons between chimps and humans, their differences average 2% to 3%. Yet the difference between their Y chromosomes is 30%!


Obviously, something very dramatic happened to the human Y, something that can’t possibly be explained by standard Darwinian evolution. The only plausible answer is, in fact, genetic engineering, but we all know mainstream science would, at all costs, avoid openly considering that as a possibility.


2012 FOXP2 DNA Report

For 13 years we at the Starchild Project have known the Starchild Skull came from a being that was not entirely human, if human at all. First, it shares no physical characteristics with a normal human skull—none! Unfortunately, this astounding divergence in physical points of comparison never impressed mainstream scientists because they could, and often did, glibly explain all of them away by insisting: Nature can do anything! But that was never true.


Nature actually functions by strict rules that confine life to well-defined boundaries outlined by the unique genetic code of each species. No laws are more firmly established than the laws of genetics. Fifty eye-witnesses can say that a person committed a crime, but if DNA shows otherwise, the witnesses are ignored. DNA dominates in courts because it is the math of biology. It says what it says, again and again, with consistency you can stake your life on.


Within that life-and-death consistency, the human genome does contain slight variations. Tiny Pygmies and tall Watusis are black Africans with stark physical differences, yet both tribes are unmistakably human. Differences in their genetic makeup make it impossible for two Pygmies to produce a Watusi, and vice-versa. Yet DNA can flex enough so that if one of each tribe were to mate, they could produce viable offspring, although the flexibility does not go beyond certain points. Something is either human, or it isn’t. There is no in-between.


Because genetics is the math of biology, the Starchild’s DNA provided the only means to overcome the mainstream explanation that it has to be a one-in-a-billion freak of Nature. Unfortunately, we had to wait [over] a decade while the technology for recovering and sequencing “ancient” DNA, such as the 900-year-old Starchild’s, could be perfected. [And, as of 2018, it is still not perfected.]


Now such new technology has been in place for a few years, and its initial extraordinarily high cost has fallen within the reach of reasonable investment. Also, we now have enough partial analyses of the Starchild’s DNA to know without doubt that when we can afford a complete inventory of its genome, it will prove to be radically different from humans.


This essay is designed to make the most crucial information about those partial analyses understandable to anyone. If you can take the 15 minutes needed to read it, you will learn about the three kinds of partial proofs we now have, what each one means, and why they will help the Starchild make history on a scale that seldom occurs in human lifetimes.


From New Scientist, Feb. 7, 2011 [text in brackets added]:
Fossils of the Denisovans, [a new extinct hominin and] close relative of Neanderthals, were discovered in Siberia in 2008. A draft genome was released in 2010 by Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, which revealed that Denisovans interbred with modern humans. However, each position in the genome was read only twice, so the fine detail was unreliable. The new genome covers each position 30 times over [so the fine detail is now highly reliable].


To understand the Starchild Skull’s unique situation, the short paragraph above must be understood. In 2010, the Max Planck laboratory secured two “reads” (short for readings) through what are called “next generation” sequencing machines. That means they made the first announcement of a draft assembly of the Denisova genome with the average depth of coverage being around two. Each assembly includes thousands to millions of individual readings, and the depth of coverage indicates how many times each reading is repeated.


As a Reminder...

“...within the limits of today’s technology, the human genome is as complete as it can be. Small gaps that are unrecoverable in any current sequencing method remain, amounting for about 1 percent of the gene-containing portion of the genome, or euchromatin. New technologies will have to be invented to obtain the sequence of these regions.” Source

 

SPIEGEL Interview with Craig Venter: ‘We Have Learned Nothing ...

In a SPIEGEL interview, genetic scientist Craig Venter discusses the 10 years he spent sequencing the human genome, why we have learned so little from it a decade on and the potential for mass production of artificial life forms that could be used to produce fuels and other resources.

 

Updated 2018

Top of Page

 

www.alienjigsaw.com: Lloyd-Pye-Starchild-skull.jpg

Lloyd Pye


Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique insights on Intervention Theory, the theory that aliens played a part in the development of human life on Earth, and his work with an unusual 900 year old skull known as the Starchild Skull.

Lloyd Pye passed away on December 9th, 2013, but he left behind him a legacy of intriguing work, which you can explore on his website.


His main areas of expertise were hominoids (pre-humans and their modern-day counterparts such as bigfoot, sasquatch, and yeti), megaliths (pyramids etc.) the origins of life on Earth, human origins, alien intervention, and the Starchild Skull.

 

2012 DNA Report

 

Starchild-skull.jpg

 

Lloyd often spoke of his desire to help others like himself who walked in the garden of alternative knowledge, and who need support to continue their work. In honor of what would have been Lloyd’s 68th birthday, his family proudly announced the creation of the “Lloyd Pye Fund for Alternative Researchers.” The fund uses the profits from Lloyd’s books and ebooks, as well as donations from the public, to provide small, one-time grants to selected researchers to allow them to progress their research.

 

 

 

 


Star Child Skull Imaging



Lloyd Pye believed the “Hydrocephaly” theory was a Debunking Tactic



 

 

 

Wikipedia Captured by Skeptics

 

 

Starchild skull image

 



Star Child Two Skulls

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 1993-2018 Global ET Research/alienjigsaw.com All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer & Terms of Use